Monday, February 8, 2010

Why perverted lifestyles should not serve in the military.


(See Commentary after article.)

Veteran groups resist 'don't ask' repeal
By Rowan Scarborough

The nation's two most prominent veterans groups have come out in opposition to President Obama's plan to end the military's long-standing ban on open homosexuals in the ranks.

The opposition from the American Legion, the largest American veterans group, and the Veterans of Foreign Wars, comes as the White House has begun a push in Congress to repeal the law this year.

Pro-gay groups received a significant boost Tuesday when the U.S.'s highest-ranking military officials, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, the Joint Chiefs chairman, told the Senate Armed Services Committee they support ending the gay ban, known as "don't ask, don't tell."

Stiff opposition is expected, and spokesmen for the VFW and the Legion told The Washington Times on Wednesday their groups do not want to see military readiness disrupted while the armed forces are fighting two wars. The two groups have more than 4 million members combined.

"We support 'don't ask, don't tell' and the position is, now, since we are still fighting two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, now is not the time to extend ourselves with a new social-engineering project," Legion spokesman Joe March said. "We expect the Pentagon will very carefully examine the implications before changing any policies to maintain that highest state of readiness."

The Legion released the wording of a resolution adopted by its executive committee last fall.

"The American Legion recognizes that the U.S. military is in the highest state of uptempo short of that experienced in World War II, and as a result there is enormous stress upon the troops in the armed forces," it states. "Now is not the time to engage in a social experiment that can disrupt and potentially have serious impact on the conduct of forces engaged in combat. The American Legion will keep an open mind to the findings and information which results from military studies and findings. Now is the time to support the existing policy."

The VFW similarly criticized changing the law as using the military as "a control group for social engineering."

"The VFW is fully aware that societal norms regarding homosexuality have changed since the 1993 passage of [the ban], but what is considered acceptable by civilians must not be blindly imposed on a military institution that the great majority of society chooses not to join," spokesman Joe Davis said.

VFW delegates approved a resolution last summer in support of keeping the ban.

====================
Why perverted lifestyles should not serve in the military.
By RW

Perversion of any kind is a mental disorder. This is caused by sin running wild in ones members and one that wages continues to harden hearts against the very Creator that created them. The so called made up sympathy word or psycho babbled symptom "homosexual, homosexuality" continues to try to justify a lifestyle that continues to prove that this behavior tries forcefully to go against natural law. That is a symptom of this sin.
The US military that upholds and protects the Constitution is in its Constitutional right to reject a person who chooses to live in this or a mental instability but it is still amazing to me that these persons who continue to FORCE this sinful behavior on society will not understand that they are owned by this sin and this sin is in abomination naturally destructive.

To have someone serve in the military who refuses to be their natural self is truly abominating. I mean should the military have heroin addicts, alcoholics, cancer patience, schizophrenics, etc. serve as well?

The "Don't ask Don't tell" policy is a fair one since mankind cannot root out all the perversions of those wanting to serve. I do pray that those serving who are caught in this sins wages will come to repentance. IF we as a society continue to be sympathetic to those who willfully continue to do what is abominating to society, isn't chaos the next step because we will reap what we sow?

RW

Global Warming aka Climate Change beliefs are coming to nil.


Since this AMLO blog has been expressing opinions and facts on this subject, having also my other blog mocked at desperately because of this subject, it is still amazing always to me how TRUTH stands against all that opposes Him because Well Jesus is our Creator and His amazing GRACE continuous us to make us fall on our faces till we get it while we are still alive. How many chances He gives all of us mankind and the end result forever will be HIM because HE is the A to the z, The Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the ending. Science comes from the Bible truly even though the Bible is not a science book it leads science to its final conclusions. It always has.
We know the first and second law of thermodynamics are truly agreeable with the first 4 chapters of Genesis and throughout the Scripture and mankind cannot really argue that away truthfully. We know mankind's fall from GRACE by his sin against GOD is the reason the whole Creation moans and groans for God to restore us from entropy to the perfection HE created. We know the whole creation is in entropy, we live it everyday.
And we again see now how even human kind seems to understand how finite and fallible he really is just by seeing the facts as they proclaim themselves without human knowledge. God always gives mankind billions and billions of moments of clarity of HIS truth. We are without excuse period.

RW

How our belief in climate change is draining away as number of doubters rises by 10% in three months

By David Derbyshire
Last updated at 12:23 AM on 06th February 2010

* Comments (54)
* Add to My Stories

A growing number of Britons are sceptical about global warming, a poll has revealed.

It found around 26 per cent - a rise of 10 per cent in just three months - do not believe the world is getting hotter.

And it showed that the proportion of those who think climate change is a reality has fallen from 83 per cent to 75 per cent since a similar survey was carried out in November.
Sinking: The IPCC wrongly said half the Netherlands was below sea level

Sinking: The IPCC wrongly said half the Netherlands was below sea level

Researchers for Populus, who conducted the poll of 1,001 adults, yesterday warned that more Britons now doubt global warming is real and the result of man-made activities than are firm believers.

More...

* How the face of Pluto changed in just two years (do you think they can blame it on global warming?)
* Police question global warming 'sceptic' scientist over 'Climategate' email leak

The rapid change in public opinion has been fuelled by the failure of the Copenhagen Climate Summit in December, the bitterly cold winter and the row over leaked emails from the University of East Anglia, which showed scientists attempting to hide data from sceptics.

At the same time, the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has come under fire after it admitted making mistakes in several of its published reports.

Yesterday the panel was forced to apologise after a major blunder was uncovered in its influential 2007 report on global warming.

In a chapter discussing the threat of rising sea levels, the IPCC claimed more than half of the Netherlands was below sea level.

In fact, just a quarter of the country is. Jacqueline Cramer, the Dutch environment minister, last night called for an investigation into the error, adding: 'I am very disturbed. I do not wish to accept any more mistakes.'
The world's top scientists have repeatedly issued dire warnings yet about the threat from climate change

The world's top scientists have repeatedly issued dire warnings yet about the threat from climate change

The new error appears in the second volume of the IPCC's 4th Assessment Report, a 980-page document which predicts the likely impacts of climate change.

It warns: 'The Netherlands is an example of a country highly susceptible to both sea-level rise and river flooding because 55 per cent of its territory is below sea level where 60 per cent of its population lives and 65 per cent of its Gross National Product (GNP) is produced.'

Although the Dutch National Bureau for Environmental Analysis has taken responsibility for the mistake, the error has fuelled criticism that key parts of the panel's report uses unreliable information and unscientific reports.

Two weeks ago, the IPCC was forced to apologise for another report that claimed Himalayan glaciers could disappear as soon as 2035.

It later emerged that most of the figures came from two 1999 magazine interviews, which had been recycled by the environmental campaign group WWF. The charity was found to have made basic errors in its arithmetic.

Just last week, it emerged that another claim - that 40 per cent of the Amazon was extremely vulnerable to a tiny decline in rain - was lifted from a second unsubstantiated report published by the WWF.
Supporters of the IPCC say that a handful of mistakes does not undermine the case for manmade global warming

Supporters of the IPCC say that a handful of mistakes does not undermine the case for manmade global warming

However, supporters of the IPCC say that a handful of mistakes does not undermine the case for manmade global warming - that carbon dioxide traps heat from the sun and that levels of the greenhouse gas have been rising rapidly since the Industrial Revolution.

Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the IPCC, said there was a 'huge volume' of science backing the theory that human activity is to blame for changes in global temperatures.

Speaking at the panel's Sustainable Development Summit in Delhi about the 'glaciergate' mistake, Dr Pachauri told the BBC: 'There is one mistake that occurred, unfortunately, and we have clearly accepted that. We have expressed regret that it took place.

'But there is a huge volume of science. The IPCC report is a massive piece of work and I think all of what we have said is totally valid.

'The fact is we have clearly shown that the impacts of climate change, if we don't take action, are going to become progressively serious.

'It is not only the warming of the Earth's system, it is also disruption in terms of extreme events.'

How Climate-Change Fanatics Corrupted Science
by Michael Barone
02/04/2010


Quick, name the most distrusted occupations. Trial lawyers? Pretty skuzzy, as witness the disgraced John Edwards, kept from the vice presidency in 2004 by the electoral votes of Ohio. Used car dealers? Always near the bottom of the list, as witness the universal understanding of the word "clunker."

But over the last three months a new profession has moved smartly up the list and threatens to overtake all. Climate scientist.

First came the Climategate e-mails made public in November that showed how top-level climate scientists distorted research, plotted to destroy data and conspired to prevent publication of dissenting views. The British government concluded last week that the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit violated the nation's freedom of information act, although the violations occurred too long ago for prosecution.

The CRU has been a major source of data for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which for 20 years has issued alarms about supposed global warming. The e-mails conclusively establish the intellectual dishonesty of the climate scientists at the CRU and their co-conspirators.

Recently, there have been even more shocking revelations. The IPCC has claimed that warming will cause the Himalayan glaciers to disappear by 2035. It turns out that that claim was based solely on a pamphlet published by the World Wildlife Federation, based on no science at all. The head of the IPCC was informed that a 1996 report said those glaciers could melt significantly by 2350, not 2035, but he let the claim stand.

As Christopher Booker writes in the Telegraph of London, "A Canadian analyst has identified more than 20 passages in the IPCC's report which cite similarly non-peer-reviews WWF or Greenpeace reports as their authority." Similarly, the Times of London reports that a claim that warming could endanger "up to 40 percent" of the Amazon rainforest came from an anti-smoking activist and had no scientific basis whatever.

"The global warming movement as we have known it is dead," writes Walter Russell Mead of the Council on Foreign Relations in The American Interest. "The movement died from two causes: bad science and bad politics."

Some decades hence, I suspect, people will look back and wonder why so many government, corporate and media elites were taken in by propaganda that was based on such shoddy and dishonest evidence. And taken in to the point that they advocated devoting trillions of dollars to a cause that was based on flagrant dishonesty and dissembling.

There was some basis for concern. If carbon dioxide emissions were the only factor affecting global climate, it is clear that increased emissions would tend to produce warmer temperatures over time. Those temperatures could create problems that rational societies would want to address.

But carbon dioxide emissions are not the only factor affecting global climate. Solar activity and water evaporation and countless other things do, too. Climate scientists do not fully understand those things and how they interact. It is rational for society to want to learn more.

Unfortunately, the cadre of climate scientists who have dominated public discussion and have controlled the IPCC have been demonstrated to be far, far less than trustworthy. Like the theorists who invented epicycles to explain away the failure of Ptolemaic theory to account for astronomical observations, they have distorted science in the interest of something that resembles religious dogma.

The secular religion of global warming has all the elements of a religious faith: original sin (we are polluting the planet), ritual (separate your waste for recycling), redemption (renounce economic growth) and the sale of indulgences (carbon offsets). We are told that we must have faith (all argument must end, as Al Gore likes to say) and must persecute heretics (global warming skeptics are like Holocaust deniers, we are told).

People in the grip of such a religious frenzy evidently feel justified in lying, concealing good evidence and plucking bad evidence from whatever flimsy source may be at hand.

The rest of us, and judging from polls that includes most of the American people, are free to follow a more rational path. In his State of the Union Address, Barack Obama alluded to "the overwhelming evidence on climate change." But he felt obliged to add, "even if you doubt the evidence" -- an admission that the evidence is less than overwhelming. On a par with, it seems, the claims of trial lawyers and the assurances of used car salesmen.

Mr. Barone is a senior writer with U.S. News & World Report and the principal co-author of "The Almanac of American Politics, published by National Journal every two years.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1248940/How-belief-climate-change-draining-away-number-doubters-rises-10-months.html#ixzz0ey3yCd1v

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Has Congress become an Oligarchy??? WE THE PEOPLE can never question there authority?

Since When Do We do we work for CONGRESS? Congress works for us...HEY AMERICANS TIME TO FIRE THESE GUYS>>>>GET IT or will you just stay deaf and dumb?

RW


A Message from Congress: No One Questions Our Authority
Wednesday, February 03, 2010
By Staff

(CNSNews.com) - In the history of the United States, Congress has never forced individual Americans to buy any good or service. That would change if the health care bills approved by either the House or Senate ever became law. Each would require individuals to buy a health insurance plan approved by the government.

Since Congress started debating these bills, CNSNews.com has been asking members of Congress: Where does the Constitution authorize Congress to force individuals to buy health insurance? The legislators have given a variety of answers. Some could give no answer at all. The video embedded here puts their answers back-to-back.




“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined.”
--James Madison
Federalist No. 45

SECOND FRAME:

The health care bills approved by the House and Senate both mandate that individuals buy health insurance. Congress has never before ordered Americans to buy anything.

THIRD FRAME:

“The government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States.”
--Congressional Budget Office Memorandum, August 1994

FOURTH FRAME:

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R.-Utah): “If that is held constitutional--for them to be able to tell us we have to purchase health insurance--then there is literally nothing that the federal government can’t force us to do. Nothing.”

FIFTH FRAME:

CNSNews.com asked Members of Congress: Where does the Constitution authorize Congress to force individuals buy health insurance?

SIXTH FRAME:

Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D.-Vt.)
CNSNews.com: "Where, in your opinion, does the Constitution give specific authority for Congress to give an individual mandate for health insurance?"

Leahy: "We have plenty of authority. Are you saying there is no authority?"

CNSNews.com: "I’m asking--"

Leahy: "Why would you say there is no authority? I mean, there’s no question there’s authority. Nobody questions that."

SEVENTH FRAME:

House Speaker Pelosi Nancy Pelosi (D.-Calif.)
CNSNews.com: “Madam Speaker, where specifically does the Constitution grant Congress the authority to enact an individual health insurance mandate?”

Pelosi: “Are you serious? Are you serious?”

EIGHTH FRAME:

Sen. Mark Warner (D.-Va.)
“There is no place in the competition, in the Constitution, there is no place in the Constitution, there is no place in the Constitution, there is no place in the Constitution, there is no place in the Constitution that talks about you ought to have the right to get a telephone, but we have made those choices as a country over the years.”

CNSNews.com: “Does the Constitution give Congress the authority to mandate whether individuals should purchase health insurance – to mandate that they have to purchase health insurance?”
Warner: “The United States Congress passed laws regarding Medicare and Medicaid that became de facto mandatory programs. States all the time require people to have driver’s licenses. I think that this is a bit of a spurious argument that’s being made by some folks.”

NINTH FRAME:

Sen. Bob Casey (D.-Pa.)
CNSNews.com: “Where does the Constitution give Congress that authority, for an individual health care mandate?”

Casey: “Well, I don’t know if there’s a specific constitutional provision.

TENTH FRAME:

Sen. Daniel Akaka (D.-Hawaii)
CNSNews.com: “Does the United States Constitution give the United States Congress the authority to mandate individuals to have health insurance, to carry health insurance?

Akaka: “I’m not aware of that--let me put it that way. …

CNSNews.com: “Is there any specific area of the Constitution that would give Congress the authority to be able to mandate individuals to have to purchase health insurance?”

Senator Akaka: “Not in particular with health insurance. It’s not covered in that respect.

ELEVENTH FRAME:

Sen. Roland Burris (D.-Ill.)
CNSNews.com: “Federally, if you look at it from a federal standpoint, what area specifically of the Constitution would give Congress the power to mandate an individual to have health insurance?”

Senator Burris: “Well, that’s under certainly the laws of the--protect the health, welfare of the country. That’s under the Constitution. We’re not even dealing with any constitutionality here. Should we move in that direction? What does the Constitution say? To provide for the health, welfare and the defense of the country.”

TWELFTH FRAME:

Sen. Jack Reed (D.-R.I.)
CNSNews.com: “Specifically where in the Constitution does Congress get its authority to mandate that individuals purchase health insurance?”

Reed: “Let me see. I would have to check the specific sections. So, I’ll have to get back to you on the specific section. But it is not unusual that the Congress has required individuals to do things, like sign up for the draft.

THIRTEENTH FRAME:

Sen. Bernard Sanders (I.-Vt.)
CNSNews.com: “Where in the Constitution does Congress get the authority for a health insurance mandate?”

Sanders: “Where in the Constitution? Probably the same place that comes Medicare and Medicaid and the CHIP Program and the Veterans Administration, and the health care programs that we’ve been doing for many, many decades.”

FOURTEENTH FRAME:

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D.-Ohio)
CNSNews.com: “Where in the Constitution does Congress get the authority for an individual health care mandate?”

Brown: “The same part of the Constitution that allows us to have Medicare. When I hear people that think this is a constitutional issue, my first question to them is, ‘Do you want to repeal Medicare?’ And some people, politically, are so extreme in this country that they want to repeal Medicare, and I think they’re dead wrong.”

FIFTEENTH FRAME:

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D.-Mo.)
CNSNews.com: “Specifically where in the Constitution does Congress get the authority to mandate that individuals buy health insurance?”

McCaskill: “Well the -- we have all kinds of places where the government has gotten involved with health care and mandating insurance. In most states, the government mandates the buying of car insurance, and I can assure everyone that if anything in this bill is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court will weigh in.”

SIXTEENTH FRAME:

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D.-Ore.)
CNSNews.com: “Specifically, where in the Constitution does Congress get its authority to mandate that individuals purchase health care?”

Merkley: “The very first enumerated power is power to provide for the common defense and the general welfare. So it’s right on, right on the front end.”

CNSNews.com: “Okay, if that’s the case--”

Press Secretary: “Thank you. I’m sorry, we have to get going. Thank you.”

SEVENTEENTH FRAME:

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D.-Calif.)
CNSNews.com: “Where in the Constitution does Congress get the authority for an individual health insurance mandate?”

Feinstein: “Well, I would assume it would be in the Commerce clause of the Constitution. That’s how Congress legislates all kinds of various programs.”

EIGHTEENTH FRAME:

Sen. Kent Conrad (D.-N.D.)
CNSNews.com: “Could you specifically say where in the Constitution does Congress get the authority to mandate that individuals get health insurance?”

Conrad: “No, but I’ll refer you to the legal counsel for the Senate and they’re the ones that lead there as the full legal basis for the individual mandate--and I assume it’s in the Commerce clause.”

NINETEENTH FRAME:

Sen. Mary Landrieu (D.-La.)
CNSNews.com: … What part of the Constitution do you think gives Congress the authority to mandate that individuals have to purchase health insurance?”

Landrieu: “Well, we’re very lucky as members of the Senate to have constitutional lawyers on our staff, so I’ll let them answer that.

TWENTIETH FRAME:

Sen. Ben Nelson (D.-Neb.)
CNSNews.com: “Specifically, where in the Constitution does Congress get its authority to mandate that individuals purchase health insurance?”

Nelson: “Well, you know, I don’t know that I’m a constitutional scholar. So, I, I’m not going to be able to answer that question.”

TWENTY-FIRST FRAME:

Sen. Richard Lugar (R.-Ind.)
CNSNews.com: “Where does Congress find the authority to mandate that people buy health insurance?”

Lugar: “I don’t have any idea

TWENTY-SECOND FRAME:

Sen. John McCain (R.-Ariz.)
CNSNews.com: "Senator, on the health care issue, where in the Constitution does Congress get the authority to mandate that individuals get healthcare?"

McCain: "That is an excellent question, and I’m sure that if they pass health care legislation, I think there would be a challenge.”

Friday, January 29, 2010

Common Sense and Victory over Bill that would have FORCED perversion in the Church Work Place




Ecclesiastes 11:10
Therefore remove [the lusts that end in] sorrow and vexation from your heart and mind and put away evil from your body, for youth and the dawn of life are vanity [transitory, idle, empty, and devoid of truth].

Science shows factually that Humans are male and female that they are alone the proper mate to each other for procreation which is natural intercourse can only be between these two alone and this can never be denied by any human with common sense.
Intercourse between same sex individuals is impossible and it is not intercourse by any means but only an act of perversion plain and simple. It is shameful and those truly caught in this web do know this. But they remain reprobate ever wickedly trying to press on their agenda forcing their perversion to be accept when it truly will never be.

It is a serial disorder in nature and only one that can be cured by true repentance in Christ Jesus. It is amazing as to how former sinners of that reprobate disorder became transformed when they actually to the step for GOD to actually make these humans who they are really supposed to be. Only God knows who they are because HE created them but GOD as the Loving Creator HE is must remove the stones of their heart so they can finally see but that is for the willing of the person caught in that web.The First thing is they have to come to terms that their lifestyle is a perversion of the things that are pure and Holy.

Soon enough mankind will realize this wholly for all sin. Sin is a perversion of Righteousness.

But the legislation's continue for these homosexual movements to force their perversion but many Persons are coming back to common sense finally allowing Nature which is God's Law as well to speak the Truth. It is common sense that SEX only belongs to male and female. It will never belong to the homosexual movement ever.

May all homosexuals turn from their sin and be regenerated, transformed by the renewing of their minds, so they can actually have that missing parts in their hearts to see Christ Jesus who alone can only fulfill their every need.

RW

(Two Stories below)
======================================================================


UK Christians Celebrate Victory Over Bill That Would Have Forced Churches To Hire Homosexuals

http://www.christianpost.com/

Some Christians say their prayers have been answered after the House of Lords on Monday defeated changes to a law that would have required church groups to hire homosexuals or others whose manner of life is inconsistent with their teaching.

Peers voted 216 to 178 in favor of Lady O’Cathain’s amendment to retain an exemption for religious groups to equality employment laws.

Reacting to the result, Lady O’Cathain said Tuesday: “I know that very many Christians were praying that justice would prevail as the House of Lords voted on this important issue. Many also wrote wise, sensitive letters to peers, seeking to persuade them of our case.

"We give thanks to God for the outcome, and we continue to pray for our Government, as Scripture exhorts us to do, that God would bless their counsels."

The Christian Institute’s Mike Judge commented, “The prayers of thousands of Christians and letter writing to peers was key to protecting our freedom."

"Surely churches should be free to employ people whose conduct is consistent with church teaching. Surely that’s not asking too much," Judge added. "It's called freedom of association, and it’s a key liberty in any democratic society. The fact that the Government couldn’t see this will concern many Christians.”

The government attempted to restrict the exemption for religious organizations solely to ministers and other positions that wholly or mainly “exist to promote or represent the religion or to explain the doctrines of the religion.”

Christians argued that if the Equality Bill was passed without Lady O’Cathain’s amendment, which leaves the current law unchanged, it would impose considerable restrictions on who religious organizations could employ and put them in the difficult position of having to appoint someone who did not conform to their ethos and beliefs.

Last week, bishops in the Church of England argued that the bill would leave religious organizations “more vulnerable to legal challenge.”

Dr. Don Horrocks, head of public affairs for the Evangelical Alliance, said the government's amendments to change the current law "would have left churches and organizations unsure whether they could prefer practicing Christians for the majority of their roles."

"Now, they can continue to appoint people who are committed to the ethos of the organizations they are supposed to represent," Horrocks said. "It's a victory for common sense. I hope the government will accept this and not prolong the issue by asking the House of Commons to challenge the Lords' vote."

Andrea Minichiello Williams, director of Christian Concern For Our Nation, also praised Monday's vote. “This is a great day for religious liberty in the United Kingdom. We are thankful that the law has not been changed and the freedom of churches to control their own affairs has not been restricted any further.

“The results show what can happen when Christians pray and take action. Let us be encouraged that even in an increasingly secular society, the voice of the Church can still be heard.”

Harriet Harman, whose name is attached to the Equality Bill, may decide to force the bill through the House of Commons or revert to an EU directive prohibiting discrimination in the workplace on the grounds of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation.
===================================================================

Legislating Immorality - Quebec Government Looks To Eliminate Belief that Homosexuality Is Immoral

http://www.wnd.com

Opponents of "hate crimes" legislation, who have frequently pointed to Canada as an example of how such laws are used to increasingly suppress moral objections to homosexuality, now have more fuel for their fire in the form of the "Quebec Policy Against Homophobia."

The policy, released last month by Quebec's Minister of Justice and Attorney General Kathleen Weil, assigns the government the task of eliminating all forms of "homophobia" and "heterosexism" – including the belief that homosexuality is immoral – from society as a whole.

The text and specifics of the policy are steeped in vague bureaucratic language about "coordination" and "synergy," but the goal is spelled out clearly: to enlist the government to normalize homosexuality in society and to quell common criticisms levied against "sexual minorities," a term the policy uses to inclusively describe "lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transsexuals and transgenders."

"An inclusive society such as ours must take the necessary steps to combat homophobic attitudes and behavior patterns and move towards full acceptance of sexual diversity," states the Premier of Quebec Jean Charest in a letter that serves as the policy's introduction. "The policy sets out the government's goal of removing all the obstacles to full recognition of the social equality of the sexual minorities, at all levels of society."

The policy further defines the heterosexism that must be stomped out as "affirmation of heterosexuality as a social norm or the highest form of sexual orientation."

Furthermore, the policy laments, "It is still possible to hear people say that homosexuality is an illness, morally wrong or a form of deviant behavior, and that people choose their sexual orientation. These beliefs, often instilled in the past, tend to marginalize sexual minority groups and prevent full recognition of their social equality."

Such "prejudice," the policy affirms, must be combated.

And while the word "church" is never explicitly mentioned in the policy, it does declare it important to publicize the most "insidious" forms of homophobia with a plan to "target the various locations in which homophobic attitudes and behavior patterns, as well as heterosexist stereotypes, are found."

The policy also warns, "It will be necessary to deal with the heterosexist values on which some institutional practices are founded."

Weil introduced her ministry's new direction by stating, "The policy released this morning shows, once again, that Quebec society is a leader in the field of sexual minority rights."

Indeed, Quebec was the first jurisdiction in North America to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation with an amendment to its charter of human rights and freedoms in 1977. In 1995, the province amended its criminal code to include sexual orientation as an aggravating factor in "hate crimes," a law expanded in 2004 to include not only crimes but "hate propaganda." Same-sex marriage was legalized in Quebec in 2005.

The progression from "hate crime" legislation to outlawing "hate propaganda" to now enlisting the government's power in socially normalizing homosexuality is the very process decried by many Americans, as the U.S. also begins passing the first of such laws.

Gary Cass of the Christian Anti-Defamation Commission, for example, told WND the practical application of such laws already has been seen in several other countries, including the United Kingdom, where the Christian Institute highlighted reports of a senior citizen being accused of "hate crimes" for writing a letter objecting to a pro-homosexual festival:

"This is the way it gets implemented in all the other countries," Cass said. "Christians are singled out for prosecution, with threats, imprisonment and fines simply for refusing to stop doing what Christ commands: proclaiming the truth."

"These cases are a good precursor of where this goes," he warned.

Weil, however, argues that until society comes to accept "sexual minorities," they will continue to be subjected to harassment, intimidation and insult – regardless of anti-discrimination laws.

"To be fully effective, the legal equality of sexual minorities must be supported by social equality," Weil writes in her introduction to the policy. "The Quebec government intends, by adopting this policy against homophobia, to play a leading role in achieving this objective."

To that end, the policy consists of four "guidelines" for the Quebec government, which, in the words of the policy, direct the government to:

Recognize the realities faced by sexual minority members

Promote respect for the rights of sexual minority members

Promote wellbeing for sexual minorities

Ensure a concerted approach by government authorities and institutions

The specific action points of the policy are loosely defined, but include funding additional studies, efforts to help "sexual minorities" find social services, rooting out institutional practices that discriminate against or intimidate "sexual minorities," adapting public services to the specific needs of the "sexual minorities" and the creation of additional bureaucracies to "monitor" progress.

A brief line in the policy, which declares that schools can play "a key role" in retraining the populace on "sexual minority" rights, however, has elicited some reaction.

Georges Buscemi, president of Campaign Quebec-Vie, a Quebec pro-life group, told LifeSiteNews.com it is "obvious" that the policy would impose homosexuality training on children.

"They've done it with the ethics and religious culture course," he said, "so I'm not at all surprised that they'd be willing to fully integrate it into that course, with extra stuff tacked on."

LifeSiteNews reports that the Ethics and Religious Culture program is a province-mandated curriculum for all Quebec students spanning grades 1 to 11 that already presents homosexuality as a normal lifestyle.

Buscemi is also alarmed by the policy's requirements that institutions and social services be conformed to fit the needs of "sexual minorities."

"I could see this being the beginning of the end of religious freedom in the sense that if a church, for example, is offering a service, for example marriage, and is not tailoring the service to the needs of a homosexual, then it could be sanctioned for not doing that," he explained.

"They're going to try for the longest possible to just use social pressure and increasingly isolate the recalcitrant entities and institutions," Buscemi predicted. "They're quite clear; they're quite unapologetic. It's going to be a concerted effort, including all the ministries. ... This is going to be a full-court press. It's going to lead to ostracizing different churches that have doctrinal oppositions to homosexual behavior."

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Save a fish, starve the humans. More unconstitutional Anti-American madness

Eze 47:9 "And wherever the river goes, every living creature that swarms will live, and there will be very many fish. For this water goes there, that the waters of the sea may become fresh; so everything will live where the river goes.





It is totally amazing as to these anti-Constitutional Progressives who joined in with the Tree hugging Pot smoking drug influenced hippies and environmental socialists thugs who continue to falsely report statistics of species becoming endangered all across the board in our good ole U S of A. These so called community organizing Quasi-Political groups given unconstitutional power by our anti constitutional Federal government continue to desperately control every aspect of Americans who have the God given, Constitutional right to have Justice, liberty, Property and freedoms to make a living in this Free Capitalist society created by those that new this country is Governed by God who allows all humans to have independent rights to exist with their fellow man.

Ever since the Environmental Protection Agency and the Endangered Species Act was given unconstitutional power to DICTATE what Americans can and cannot do, (this is Government violating the Constitution), The Decline in American civilization has drastically come to a economic halt because of these Politicians who continue to force their Marxist Utopian tyranny on a Nation that already has a firm foundation protecting Human rights.

Take for instance the The Global warming , Climate Change Cap and Trade propaganda of the Polar Bear. They claimed that this species became endangered to a minimal amount when in fact The Polar bear population was more than it has been in History. These are the same mental Political group of persons that claimed the Sturgeon was instinct when in fact it is alive and well and heavily populated. These are also the same persons who raided a farmers lively hood using the Eminent domain unconstitutional clause over a supposed endangered frog habitat and again a certain type of fruit fly?

And we see the same persons are now taking over the whole California Delta and the San Joaquin valley in California which is Home to the biggest Private farm industries in the World, who trade and free markets are the best the world has ever seen and now because of a supposed endangered SMELT which of course is related to all kinds of Smelt, It has become a DUST BOWL and not by natural means but unnatural man made means. The Stopped allowing Aqueducts and the Levees to water all the Farms in the whole valleys destroying the lively hood of California American Farmers which is part of this economic collapse. The Farming industry can bring back JOBS by the millions if these Politicians were kicked out of office with insane Marxist Utopia environmental organizations who want to CONTROL every aspect of American RIGHT TO FREE Livelihood so they can DICTATE what Americans can or can't do in the name of Climate Change , Cap and Trade or whatever Stupid fear they can propagandize to continue to war with Capitalism.

So humans must starve so the SMELT or any other false accusation endangered species can be saved. The SMELT is more important than Humans. Humans must starve to save this non endangered species.

America, We must stop these Progressives and rid them from our Nation. They are a parasite eating away our Constitutional Rights little by little like termites. Soon, if Americans do not take back the Power Back for those WE elected and put them in check BECUASE THEY WORK FOR US WE DO NOT WORK FOR THEM Proving (WE THE PEOPLE are the Government), they will continue to like Elitist's create a society Of the tyrannic nature , exactly what our FORE FATHERS warned us about.

Thus far they are telling what you can eat or should, They want to control health care, They want to control Industry with Cap and Trade, They continue to allow Lawyers and Judges to be frivolous creating awry justice, and any other Marxist schemes they can come up with to rule the country and create another Third World type scenario to follow the other Governments in the World.

We really are the Greatest Nation in History, the ones Romans, Greeks, and Israel Admired. These are the three that helped form our Nation creating America to be Judeo Christian in Prosperity. And now we are threatened by a small group of Liberal thinkers and elitists who want to reform us back to the Dark ages. Like President Teddy Roosevelt said along with President Woodroe Wilson who agreed and Every Progressive Politician down the line, " TO HELL WITH THE CONSTITUTION"!


America is this what you really Want?

Time to come back a REFOUND our nation back to the Constitution, the mean LEGALIZE IT TO BE THE ONLY GUIDLINE POLITICANS< LAWYERS JUDGES ETC AND EVERY OTHER AMERICAN MUST FOLLOW. Will you come and fight the Progressive Enemy?

QUIT TRYING TO THINK YOU CAN CONTROL OR SAVE NATURE AND TURN THE WATER BACK ON AND LET NATURE DO WHAT NATURE DOES. IT DOES NOT NEED HUMAN GUIDANCE OR PROTECTION. GOD LAWS OF NATURE ALREADY RULE NATURE BY ITSELF.

2Pe 2:12 But these, like irrational animals, creatures of instinct, born to be caught and destroyed, blaspheming about matters of which they are ignorant, will also be destroyed in their destruction,

RW
============================

Farmers fight against Delta Smelt Protection
Monday, January 25, 2010

FRESNO, CA (KGO) -- Farmers in the Central Valley are fighting back against the government's plan to save a threatened fish, the Delta Smelt.

On Monday, a legal group filed suit on behalf of three farmers, who have had their water allocations cut.

The suit claims the federal government doesn't have the authority to get involved with the Delta Smelt, because this is a state matter.

"But when we're talking about the delta smelt, there's nothing interstate, or commercial about this fish. the delta smelt's found only in California, and it has no commercial reason, excuse me, it has no commercial value," Brandon Middleton from the Pacific Legal Foundation said.

Last month, a federal judge in Fresno ruled against The Pacific Legal Foundation. It's now asking the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to hear its case.
=================================

Calif. water agency changes course on delta smelt
By COLIN SULLIVAN, Greenwire
Published: May 12, 2009


A blog about energy, the environment and the bottom line.


SAN FRANCISCO -- A fragile truce in a long battle over an endangered fish took a hit last week as California water regulators urged the federal government to reconsider protections for the delta smelt.

Lester Snow, director of the California Department of Water Resources, is questioning whether increasing freshwater flows in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to protect the tiny fish is worth the effort -- a reversal of the department's position.

Citing "new information," Snow told the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that a federal biological opinion in place since December may be overstating threats to the smelt. The opinion ordered pumping restrictions throughout California's State Water Project in wet years to ensure water flows for the smelt during the fall spawning season.

Unpublished research conducted by Snow's department, in concert with the California Department of Fish and Game, has revealed the existence of a separate delta smelt population in an area that is not affected by state water operations, Snow said. The population in question is thriving in a tidal marsh around Liberty Island in the northern delta. MORE http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/05/12/12greenwire-calif-water-agency-changes-course-on-delta-sme-10572.html
=====================================

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

WND Exclusive: Progressives desperately trying to stop the Tea baggers etc.

Famous Quote by a Famous progressive: "To Hell with the Constitution" ( Teddy Roosevelt)




How many new lows are these Progressives come up with to save their immoral power status that has been ruining this country for 100 years? To think they even are trying desperately hard and stealing away the name of GRASSROOTS to CON their agendas by Paying indoctrinated people to continue to help them Ruin our Nation and our forefathers foundations to stop to even newer LOWS to recruit more brainwashed persons to fulfill their immoralities. They pay people to support their iniquities? Look at their desperation. (Above)

Why cannot we be the same Nation that is ran by the Constitution. The Constitution and all 17 pages Work perfectly. Nothing need to be changes. As William Penn soundly stated..If we are not ruled by GOD then we will be ruled by tyrants.

All the Progressives need to be removed from Power..They Are the domestic enemies and of the Constitution, are they not?


WND Exclusive
Help wanted: $24,000 to stop Glenn Beck, 'tea-baggers'
'Grass-roots' organizers sought to 'counter hysteria and lies'
Posted: January 26, 2010
9:16 pm Eastern

By Chelsea Schilling
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

Help-wanted ads are appearing on Craigslist that offer to pay citizens $24,000 a year, plus health insurance, to "counter the hysteria and lies of Glenn Beck and other talking heads" and "stop the tea-baggers!"

The ads are being posted by Grassroots Campaigns, a for-profit canvassing group that has performed services for the Democratic National Committee and MoveOn.org. Its postings can be found among Craiglist listings in Chicago, Ill.; San Francisco, Calif.; Boston, Mass.; Philadelphia, Penn. and Austin, Texas.

"Whose agenda will win in 2010?" the ad asks. "You decide."


Craiglist posting offers salary to 'stop the tea-baggers.'

It continues, "Change takes work. After the 2008 election, we know what's possible when millions of people commit themselves to creating the world they want to see – but we also know that one election is only the beginning. Across the country, the struggle for human rights, marriage equality, and reproductive rights continues. To counter the hysteria and lies of Glenn Beck and other talking heads, progressives need to get organized and get activated – and we don't have a moment to lose!!"

Get the prescription for reclaiming America's heritage of liberty, justice and morality – Joseph Farah's "Taking America Back," autographed only at the WND SuperStore.

Grassroots Campaigns explains that it is seeking to immediately hire directors to run 32 canvass offices across the nation in the following locations: California, Colorado, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington and Washington, D.C.

A message to Grassroots Campaigns inquiring about its positions was not returned.



According to the postings, qualified candidates must expect to work 80 to 100 hours a week, meaning they would make less than minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. Grassroots Campaigns was criticized in 2006 because canvassers said they were paid less than state minimum wages and told to go door-to-door advocating for a minimum-wage increase.

"I worked 37 hours one week and got paid around $130 [after taxes]," recalled one canvasser who quit after two weeks.

Yet another worker reported working for 45 hours at Grassroots Campaigns for five days and receiving just $56.

Workers for the advertised position are expected to recruit and build teams of 15-50 canvassers within local communities. They must be:

* Committed to and motivated by progressive politics and social change.

* Leaders, with the ability to think strategically and motivate a team.

* Goal-oriented, excellent communicators, team players.

"Get on the frontlines of some of the most crucial campaigns of our time!" the ad urges. "Work on the ground bringing progressive change to America!"

As WND reported, this is not the first time Craigslist has been used to lobby for Democratic Party goals. Help-wanted ads appeared in August 2009 offering to pay citizens between $9 and $16 an hour to lobby for the passage of Obama's health care.

Several of those ads declared, "Help pass Obama's health care reform! Earn $325-$550 per week!"

WND also reported when Organizing
for America, the movement some call "Obama 2.0" has also recruited college students and offered to provide credits toward degree plans in exchange for their advocacy skills.

The group has also descended upon college campuses, knocking on dorm doors to recruit students and slam lawmakers with phone calls pushing health-care "reform."

Legalize Competing Currencies, BRILLIANT!






IT IS amazing to me that once upon a free American time protected by the Constitution we had Gold or silver COINS etc for currency instead of paper money which is worth nothing really. Paper is paper it has no value. It was a Paper bank note. And back then before the FED we had the US Note to which I am surprised this is not allowed over the FED note which is not WE THE PEOPLE BACKED. THE FED IS A A PRIVATE INDUSTRY CARTEL. The US NOTE was the legal tender over any FED NOTE. President John Kennedy knew this and before HE was shot and killed for being very conservative and not a progressive. He executed an executive order called( EX. ORDER 1111 ) to have the US note compete with the Fed Note. IT WAS SIGNED INTO LAW WHICH WAS A WONDERFUL IDEA and a competing factor of good capitalism. Two competing bank notes. That is still supposed to an order allowed to this day..but of course your Progressive Cartel Government will not release that information and continues to cover it up and remain trying to hold onto its IRON FIST that is made of clay. There is much we do not know, but more will be revealed. Nothing can ever remain a secret. GOD is in control as always so there is nothing knew under the sun.

RW

Ron Paul: Legalize Competing Currencies 1/25
by Congressman Ron Paul
Texas Straight Talk
Mon, Jan 25th, 2010

* DIGG IT *

Source: Texas Straight Talk

Much has been made recently about the supposed economic recovery. A few blips in a few statistics and many believe our troubles are all over. Of course, they have to redefine recovery as “jobless” to account for the lack of improvement on Main Street. But the banks have money, Wall Street is chugging along, and the administration would like to get on with other agenda.

They have even set up a commission to investigate the crisis as if it were all in the past.



The truth is that Americans are still losing jobs, the Fed is still inflating, and more regulations are in the works that will prevent jobs and productivity from coming back. We are on this trajectory for the long haul. The claim has been made many times that this administration has only had a year to clean up the mess of the last administration. I wish they would at least get started! Instead of reversing course, they are maintaining Bush’s policies full speed ahead. They are even keeping the Bush-appointee in charge of the Federal Reserve! They are not even making token efforts at change in economic policy. And for all the talk of transparency, we hear that some powerful senators will do all they can to block a simple audit of the powerful and secretive Federal Reserve.



We have been on a disastrous course for a long time. The money supply has doubled in the last year, our debt is unsustainable, the value of the dollar is going to continue its drop, and those Americans who understand where we are headed feel helpless and held hostage by foolish policy makers in Washington. When the bills finally come due and the dollar stops working we are in for some real social, economic and political chaos. That is, unless we take some major steps now to allow for a peaceful transition in the future. These steps are laid out in my legislation to legalize competing currencies.



First of all, no one should be compelled by law to operate in Federal Reserve notes if they prefer an alternative. We should repeal legal tender laws and allow Americans to conduct transactions in constitutional money. Only gold and silver can constitutionally be legal tender, not paper money. Instead, it is illegal to conduct business using gold and silver instead of Federal Reserve notes. Simply legalizing the Constitution should be a NO-BRAINER to anyone who took an oath of office. Consequently, private mints should be allowed to mint gold and silver coins. They would be subject to fraud and counterfeit laws, of course, and people would be free to use their coins or stay with Federal Reserve notes, as they see fit. Finally, we should abolish taxes on gold and silver, which puts precious metals at a competitive disadvantage to paper money.



The Federal Reserve is a government-sanctioned BANKING CARTEL that has held far too much power for far too long and is in the end stages of running the dollar into the ground, and our economy along with it. The very least Congress can do, if they are not willing to abolish the Fed, and perhaps not even conduct a serious audit of it, is to allow citizens the freedom to defend themselves from being completely wiped out by their monopoly power.

Obsolete United States currency and coinage
Topics
United States coinage · United States dollar · History of the United States dollar · Large denominations of currency
U.S. currency icon.gif
Coins
Fugio Cent · Half cent · Large cent · Two-cent piece · Three-cent piece · Half dime · Twenty-cent piece · Trade Dollar
Gold Coins
Gold dollar · Quarter Eagle ($2.50) · Three-dollar piece · Stella ($4) · Half Eagle ($5) · Eagle ($10) · Double Eagle ($20)
Currency
Colonial scrip · Compound Interest Treasury Note · Demand Note · Federal Reserve Bank Note · Fractional Currency · Gold Certificate · Interest Bearing Note · National Bank Note · National Gold Bank Note · Refunding Certificate · Silver Certificate · Treasury or Coin Note · Treasury Notes (19th Century) · United States Note